Wavelab 7 not allowing individual artist name in cd text
" I Bet You Look Good on the Dancefloor"). " Crazy") or the significance of the song in catapulting a band to overnight fame (e.g. " Beat It"), information regarding their multi-platinum status (e.g. By "tracks that have enough contextual importance to justify its own article", I mean tracks which have explained the relevant history for that song (e.g. Fantailfan 14:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Yeah prod them all. However, should you prod the pages, you may encounter opposition from those who are proprietary about 'their' pages despite the uselessness (sorry, I meant lack of encylopedic value) of long analyses of three minute songs. I'm not sure about these as they are fairly long articles, but again it's mostly just "this is what the lyrics are about" and pointless (though not uninteresting) trivia. all those linked at Wish You Were Here (album)#Track listing or Animals (album)#Track listing etc etc ad nauseum). Wield the axe! DJR ( talk) 12:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC) Okay, but how about less obviously pointless pages like the Pink Floyd ones (i.e. I've done the same thing with A Certain Romance. DJR ( talk) 12:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC) Furthermore, the example you give should be prodded IMHO - they have no enclopaedic value and their infoboxes just contain the album's information. Anything else should just be put into the album's article. MightyMoose22 > Abort, Retry, Fail?_ 12:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC) I agree - the only tracks that should have their own pages are those released as singles (and even then it should only be for famous singles), or tracks that have enough contextual importance to justify its own article. Either way, there's really not much to say about most of these tracks, other than "it was in Tommy and it's about something-or-other". At the very most they should be edited into one the songs or the plot of Tommy article, nes pas? MightyMoose22 > Abort, Retry, Fail?_ 12:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC) Okay, maybe a 30 second track wasn't the best example, so how about Acid Queen or Eyesight to the Blind (The Hawker). Surely these should be included on the album's page, if at all. It seems a bit excessive to me, especially as it's mostly pages like It's A Boy (The Who). What are people's thoughts about albums being laid out track by track on seperate pages? I've just become aware (no pun intended) of this happening with The Who's Tommy. 33 Proposal for Category:Uncategorized albums.
32 On: people not following the guidelines.31.1 Capitalization of foreign-language titles.27 Recat discussion of Category:Comedy recordings to Category:Comedy albums.24 How many albums is needed to justify an "Artist albums" category?.16 IMPORTANT Video game albums error / request.12 Straw poll about the proposed infobox changes.8 Problem with some Phish album chronology.7 Why are only studio albums put in the chronology section?.2.1 Thoughts about the infobox changes proposal.